|
Ideally, 5 Ã-- 107 white blood cells (WBCs), corresponding to 10 to 20 mL of peripheral blood, should be used. (2) In multicenter studies with centralized molecular analysis, RNA should be stabilized at the bedside. (3) The level of BCR-ABL transcripts per volume cDNA should be related to the expression of a commonly agreed standard gene, for example, total ABL. The definition of "undetectable BCR-ABL" in a given patient should be closely related to these universal recommendations. An "international Study on Standardization of Residual Disease Detection in BCR-ABL-positive Leukemia" was launched recently. If standardization can be achieved, quantitative PCR will become a robust basis for clinical decision making in patients on imatinib therapy."
Dr. Hochhaus is talking not only about the importance of Q-PCR but the need for standardization across the board.
Brian J Druker, MD (USA):
"After starting imatinib, we monitor blood counts at least once per month and obtain marrow samples every 6 months until a complete cytogenetic remission is obtained, then yearly thereafter. We have dispensed with a marrow sample at 3 months, as we would not change therapy based on the results. For example, if a patient had a CHR, but no cytogenetic response at 3 months, we would continue imatinib therapy for at least 3 more months. Marrow samples are obtained yearly after a complete cytogenetic response is obtained to monitor for the emergence of clonal abnormalities in the Ph- clone, which thus far has been uncommon. Quantitative RT-PCR for Bcr-Abl is performed every 3 months on peripheral blood or marrow as results correlate quite well."
Dr. Druker is recommending Q-PCR monitoring with yearly BMB after CCR.
George Q. Daley. MD, PhD (USA):
"First, Goldman et al recommend monitoring imatinib-treated patients by cytogenetics on a bone marrow sample taken every 3 months to assess whether a patient is making progress toward complete cytogenetic remission, and to identify nonresponders or those who lose response. But given that popular patient websites provide intense coverage of the latest breaking news in the CML field, there are bound to be numerous inquiries to physicians about the need for molecular monitoring. It is important to point out the highly experimental nature of monitoring of BCR/ABL transcript number by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and screening for mutations that might contribute to drug-resistance by DNA sequencing. These techniques are not routinely available to the vast majority of clinicians treating CML patients, and while cutting edge, have not yet proven to translate directly into improved patient outcomes."
Dr. Daley is cautions about the still experimental nature of Q-PCR.
Jorge Cortes, MD (USA):
"Patients have to be assessed with cytogenetic analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and competitive, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at the time of diagnosis. It is inappropriate to start therapy based only on a peripheral blood PCR for the Bcr/Abl rearrangement.
Patients with clonal evolution have a survival disadvantage when treated with imatinib as a single agent, and this can only be discovered at diagnosis by cytogenetics.
Continued Next Page
Back
Goldman's Clinical Decisions
|
|